mplementation Plan – was agreed at the COP27 summit in November 2022. included a historic commitment by richer nations to give money to developing nations to help them recover from the damage and economic losses wreaked from ongoing climate change impacts.It followed a year of devastating climate change-related disasters, from severe floods in Pakistan to ongoing drought in East Africa. But there was no agreement to reduce fossil fuel usage. The plan – although not legally binding – has provided new ambitions for the world’s nations on climate change. For the first time countries agreed to establish a “loss and damage” fund. This will be a pot of money to help poorer nations recover from the impacts of climate change, such as destroyed homes, flooded land or lost income from dried-out crops. Previously, these countries have only received money for mitigation – efforts to move away from fossil fuels, and adaptation. This is money to prepare for the future impacts of climate change. The issue of loss and damage has been highly controversial. Richer nations have previously not wanted to agree to a new fund as they thought it would make them liable to cover all economic losses from climate change.In October – after five rounds of negotiations – countries agreed the fund would be run by the World Bank, but the total value of the fund and the amount developed countries would contribute was not finalised. It is hoped that these details will be agreed in December at COP28. Why haven’t previous funding pledges to poor countries been met? in Glasgow, countries agreed to “phase down” coal. The next step was for countries to agree to commitments on reducing the use of oil and gas – but this did not materialise at COP27.Instead countries committed to “enhancing a clean energy mix, including low-emission and renewable energy”.But the phrase “low-emission energy” has raised concerns. It has not been formally defined, and there is worry that it could open the door to more gas development – as burning gas produces less emissions than other fossil fuels like coal. The UK’s independent climate change body, the UKCCC, concluded there had been “limited progress on ambition to reduce emissions”.The president for this years’ COP – Sultan al-Jaber of the UAE – has said the phase down of fossil fuels is “inevitable” and that this years’ summit will accelerate expansion of renewables and carbon capture to achieve this.
What else was agreed in Sharm el-Sheikh? Nature and food
the main agreement had specific sections on forests and “nature-based solutions”.These are actions that protect or enhance the environment that also have climate benefits, for example restoring mangroves.By including these new sections, leaders agreed that climate change, and efforts to protect plants and animals, should be complementary and not contradictory. Just weeks after COP27 governments met again in Montreal to agree a “global goal for nature” Call for “peace pact with nature” The text also mentioned food for the first time, and recognised how food shortages could continue to be driven by climate change.New research that 42% of recent food price inflation has been due to climate change.In Egypt countries committed to a four-year programme to discuss solutions to ongoing food issues. World Bank warns of ‘human catastrophe’ food crisis
Buying less stuff
Currently countries calculate their total emissions and set targets based on what they produce within their borders, such as from producing electricity, or burning fuels. This means they don’t count the emissions from the goods and services produced by another country for them. This is despite the fact that developed nations import large amounts of manufactured products. If these “consumption-based” emissions were counted then the UK’s carbon footprint would more than double. For the first time in a global climate agreement countries recognised “the importance of transition[ing] to sustainable patterns of consumption”.It is not yet clear how governments will translate this into local plans or actions.
Trading carbon
COP Glasgow countries agreed to establish a global market for trading carbon. this means that countries or companies that produce fewer emissions than their targets could “sell” the carbon as a credit to another country or company that has produced too many emissions. Although the basic rules for this market had been agreed before Egypt there were still a lot of unresolved issues. The main one was what could be counted as a carbon credit. For example if a country planted lots of trees which absorb carbon dioxide could they sell this? recommendations in Sharm el-Sheikh. Action Aid International, told the BBC there was concern that indigenous groups’ rights wouldn’t be protected: A decision on this issue has now been delayed till COP28 this year.
How will countries be made to meet their pledges?
The focus of COP27 in Egypt was all about implementation – rather than new targets Eight years ago, countries were asked to make changes to keep global warming “well below” 2C – and to try to aim for 1.5C. Ahead of the conference last year 200 countries were asked to submit new plans to cut emissions by 2030, to prevent temperatures rising by more than 1.5C. With these new plans, global temperatures are still expected to rise to 2.4C. So the Egyptian COP President Sameh Shoukry wanted to focus on turning some of the more ambitious targets and pledges into tangible action. Some countries will put the commitments they make at COPs into domestic law, but most will have to be self-policed.This means it is difficult to hold countries to account for their promises. Back in 2009 richer nations promised developing countries they would give them $100bn (£88bn) a year by 2020 to help with climate change, that goal was missed and there has been no action. Simple guide to climate change What will climate change look like for you? How extreme weather is linked to climate change